News and Publications

“Every day do something that will inch you closer to a better tomorrow.”  —Doug Firebaugh

Kelleher Associates supports each client with resources and information during the executive mentoring and coaching processes.  In this section you will find company news, articles and presentations.  The presentations cover topics from career management misconceptions to managing your career transition.



Taking the Fear and Misconception out of Networking Print
Monday, 03 January 2011 10:45
“Networking” is a word that has the power to intimidate both introverts and extroverts alike and it can shake the confidence and composure of even the most confident and self assured jobseeker or business professional. For many, it creates the uncomfortable vision of wandering around at a business or social function trying to handout business cards to as many people as possible knowing the majority of the cards will end up in tomorrow’s trash.
People generally hate the idea of networking because they fear it will make them look pushy, disingenuous, or desperate. Tactless and inappropriate attempts to ask people whom we hardly know for a job or a business lead will have exactly that effect. But networking, when practiced effectively, is a critical skill that adds value and reward in both the professional and social aspects of our lives. It’s not just an essential business skill, but an equally essential life skill.
Networking Reality
Networking is simply the act of proactively building and sustaining mutually beneficial relationships. Fundamentally its about connecting with people who are willing and receptive to being helpful while at the same time extending yourself as ready resource to them. From a business perspective, it can include exchanging business contacts, sales leads and resources. For job seekers, it represents the single most effective and efficient way to navigate the job market. While the spirit of networking must be “win-win” (where both parties see a benefit), in actuality, the benefits may not be equal or immediately apparent. You may offer assistance to people who are unable to help you, and other times people will help you even if you can’t return the favor. Sometimes the results come much later, but it always seems to even out in the long run.
Don’t Underestimate the Strength of Weak Ties
Networking is often more productive through casual acquaintances (weak ties) than through close friends (strong ties) because these more distant relationships provide much more diversity of knowledge, background, and connections than those that you are already well associated with.  By definition you share a lot of commonality with friends, family, and colleagues so your networks are likely very similar. New acquaintances on the other hand are likely to be part of a very different network and are likely to know different people and have different ideas.  Your acquaintances, contacts and connections (i.e. your network) represent a source of social power. In theory, the broader and deeper your network, the more power it provides.
“Dig Your Well Before You Get Thirsty”
A few years ago, Harvey MacKay wrote a book on networking titled Dig Your Well Before You Get Thirsty. It’s a great title that paints a powerful word picture about the need to be proactive in developing and maintaining your professional and personal networks rather than ignoring them until you are in need.  Your network is a valuable resource that can be leveraged in a powerful way if you have taken the time to nurture and develop these important connections. If you haven’t yet dug your well, start now so it’s there when you need it.
The Big Three Networking Mistakes:
Don’t mistake the company’s network for your own. While your network may include parts of your company’s network (colleagues, clients, vendors, etc.), it needs to be bigger and broader. Recognize that some contacts are in your network by virtue of your current role and may drop out of your network or cease to be as meaningful should you lose your current position. Counter this by maintaining an active network outside your current company and industry.
Don’t lead with self-interest. Networking based solely on self-interest does not work. Self-interested motivation is probably the chief cause for failure in networking.  Other reasons for failure are: poor listening skills; overlooking the benefits of an exchange of information; considering each contact as a separate entity rather than as a possible resource to other contacts; lack of reciprocation or appreciation; and pre-judging anticipated results.
Don’t presume - or make imaginary distinctions - about people before you meet them. Don’t be overly-intimidated or overly-impressed by someone’s job title, social status, or initial impression. Likewise, don’t dismiss others as unimportant or unworthy of interaction or conversation based on preconception or imaginary distinctions. Step outside your comfort zone - engage in conversation. Chemistry and mutual interest are far more important in building relationships than credentials.
Three Keys to Networking Success:
Appear likeable and approachable. In social interactions, lasting first impressions are formed in the first 15 seconds of an interaction. Be cognizant of the image you are transmitting and make it one that is likeable and approachable.  Be positive, without being brash. Be friendly, without being overly-flattering.  Make eye contact, focus on remembering the other person’s name, and use it in the conversation. Nothing signifies attention and interest more than eye contact, focusing on the conversation at hand and using the person’s name during conversation. Listen to what others say and ask questions to engage them and draw them out.  It’s about making a connection. It’s not about finding an opening so that you can launch into your sales pitch.
Make yourself worth getting to know. You get value by giving value. Think of yourself as a knowledge resource and think of each person as potentially gaining value from knowing you. Think of networking as gathering and sharing ideas. The more people you interact with, the more you can act as a conduit of information, ideas, and connections.  Effective networking springs from a helpful attitude and a genuine desire to be a useful contact or resource for others.  Become a connector of people, ideas, and information.
Manage your network. Maintain a system for keeping track of you contacts and remembering important information about them. It doesn’t matter what system you use (LinkedIn, Outlook, a paper address book, etc.) but use it and maintain it. Go through your network list regularly to evaluate your contacts and your priorities. Be mindful of your relationship goals and take the actions you need to achieve them. Most experts believe it’s impossible to maintain meaningful relationships with more than 150-200 people at a time.  As you add to your network, consistently evaluate the status of relationships. Some will do fine with little investment or attention, while others won’t grow no matter how hard you work at them. Focus significant energy on a third group – relationships that will grow only with the investment of your time and attention.
With Whom do you Network?
Start with people you know. Not only is it less daunting, it’s also more efficient to build on your existing network rather than starting from scratch. Make time to connect with colleagues, friends, or people you have worked with in the past. Make a commitment to stay connected and schedule time on a weekly basis for phone conversations, a cup of coffee or lunch with your people in network to keep these connections alive. Look for opportunities to expand your network to include people you wouldn’t ordinarily come in contact with – perhaps from professions, cultures, or backgrounds different from your own.  When choosing social of business organizations to join, make the decision based on interest and commitment rather than defaulting to those that you think you should join but that generate little personal enthusiasm or interest. There is no such thing as the “right time” or the “right place” to meet the “right people.” You may meet them at your workplace, at your children’s’ activities, or at social events.
Put yourself out there and enjoy the exploration of meeting new and interesting people whenever and wherever you see an opportunity. Networking is an essential part of business and personal life that opens doors, expands your world, and creates unbelievable opportunity. Practice it, enjoy it, and prosper!

“Networking” is a word that has the power to intimidate both introverts and extroverts alike and it can shake the confidence and composure of even the most confident and self assured jobseeker or business professional. For many, it creates the uncomfortable vision of wandering around at a business or social function trying to handout business cards to as many people as possible knowing the majority of the cards will end up in tomorrow’s trash.

People generally hate the idea of networking because they fear it will make them look pushy, disingenuous, or desperate. Tactless and inappropriate attempts to ask people whom we hardly know for a job or a business lead will have exactly that effect. But networking, when practiced effectively, is a critical skill that adds value and reward in both the professional and social aspects of our lives. It’s not just an essential business skill, but an equally essential life skill.

Networking Reality

Networking is simply the act of proactively building and sustaining mutually beneficial relationships. Fundamentally its about connecting with people who are willing and receptive to being helpful while at the same time extending yourself as ready resource to them. From a business perspective, it can include exchanging business contacts, sales leads and resources. For job seekers, it represents the single most effective and efficient way to navigate the job market. While the spirit of networking must be “win-win” (where both parties see a benefit), in actuality, the benefits may not be equal or immediately apparent. You may offer assistance to people who are unable to help you, and other times people will help you even if you can’t return the favor. Sometimes the results come much later, but it always seems to even out in the long run.

 
CEO Succession Planning: Should It Be A Horserace? Print
Monday, 06 December 2010 00:00

A recent article in the Harvard Business Review authored by Anne Mulcahy, the former CEO of Xerox (succeeded by Ursula Burns as CEO in 2009), makes a case for not pitting succession CEO candidates against each other and creating a dysfunctional horserace where critical executive talent may run for the exits if not given the golden ring. She points to one of the most public succession processes in history – the three way race to succeed the retiring Jack Welch at GE in 2000 among Jeffrey Immelt, Jim McNerney, and Robert Nardelli. Immelt got the GE top spot and both McNerney and Nardelli, each major contributors at GE at that time, left the company, presumably diluting the depth of GE's executive talent pool. McNerney become CEO for a short four years at 3M and then departed to take the top spot at Boeing where he remains. Nardelli was hired as CEO at Home Depot and then, after a rocky and unsuccessful stint (other than his egregious $210 million severance package), was hired as CEO by an already struggling Chrysler and proceeded to steer it into bankruptcy. He now works in private equity.

In contrast, Mulcahy started a dialogue with her Board about who might succeed her at the time she stepped into her job in 2001. Four candidates, including Burns, were identified and given a series of development assignments and visibility with the Board. She had regular conversations with each of the candidates and was realistic along the way about their status and, by implication, their chances of succeeding her at Xerox. A key element of her approach was to discuss other positions for them in the company if they didn't get the role of CEO such that, unlike GE, they felt good about their future potential and the contributions they could make to Xerox beyond CEO succession. Fortunately, Xerox had the time to develop her successor over time. This process played out over seven years, though Burns performed exceptionally well as she was given wider responsibilities and responded positively to constructive style and behavioral feedback she received from Mulcahy, ultimately emerging as the Board lead succession candidate in 2008. Notably, two of the other three CEO candidates are still with Xerox in key positions and the third has retired.

Mulcahy has some thoughtful points to make about CEO succession:

  • Succession discussions and planning need to start a lot earlier than is generally comfortable for the sitting CEO.
  • Succession should play out over 3-5 years at a minimum.
  • Candidates for succession should be given critical development responsibilities and visibility with the Board.
  • Clear guidelines need to be set with regard to timelines and expectations for the Board, the CEO, and the succession candidates.
  • If a clear frontrunner candidate for succession emerges, that candidate should be groomed by the CEO, making sure that one person is absolutely the best fit for the job.
  • Limiting CEO tenure to no more than a decade is sensible and prevents, among other things, sclerosis, entitlement, and the "killing off" of successors at the top.

I think you would agree that CEO succession is both tricky, critical, and complicated. Approaching it in the same thoughtful way other key business initiatives are pursued, regardless of whether a company or organization is public or private, is absolutely essential for the continued health and success of the enterprise.

 
How to Switch Careers Print
Friday, 04 June 2010 08:24

"Learn the special vocabulary, terminology, and acronyms used in your target industry. Study and master the dynamics of the new field through written materials, news stories, annual reports, investment bank research and conversations with industry insiders, advises Mitch Wienick, president and CEO of Kelleher Associates."

Originally published by The Faster Times - Full Article Here

 
When is Lunch Not Really a Lunch? Print
Friday, 12 February 2010 11:38

When It’s a Job Interview
Common Mistakes Candidates Make During a Lunch Interview,
According to Kelleher Associates, LLC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Emily DiTomo
Buchanan Public Relations
610-649-9292
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

WAYNE, PA. (January xx, 2010) --- If you’re fortunate enough to be taken to lunch during a job interview, don’t make the mistake of assuming the meal is your opportunity to relax and refuel, says Mitch Wienick, President and CEO of Kelleher Associates, LLC, a career counseling firm.

“The assumption that lunch is being served for your dining pleasure is misguided,” said Wienick. “Job seekers shouldn’t forget for one second that they are being interviewed, no matter how relaxing the setting.”

Employers often use meals to gauge a candidate’s behavior in more social settings.  But “more social” does not mean candidates can let down their guard. “A lunch or dinner can be a stressful event for a job seeker, particularly if multiple representatives from the company attend,” Wienick says.

 
How to Ace the New Job Interview Print
Friday, 18 September 2009 00:00

Originally published via CBS MoneyWatch.com [Full Article]

Excerpts:

2. Prepare to Run a Gantlet

...And a quick practical note: A long day of multiple interviews may not include lunch, so pack an energy bar or two to snack on between rounds, suggests Mitch Wienick, CEO of Kelleher Associates, a career counseling firm...

3. Focus on How You Can Help the Company — Today

...For example, according to Wienick, if you’re asked “What sort of things have you done to grow a company in the past?” you might respond “In my prior role as CEO (situation) of a company trying to turn itself around (task), I convinced the board that we needed to put together a small M&A team to explore acquiring other businesses (action). As a result, I was able to accelerate growth from 3 percent to 10 percent and profitability by 20 percent (resolution).”...

[Full Article]

 
Deliberative downsizing: Costs should be considered Print
Thursday, 17 September 2009 19:00

Philadelphia Business Journal - by Victoria Green & Mitch Wienick
Friday, September 18, 2009

pbj-logoIn today’s tough economy, companies are obviously struggling and are laying off employees at levels not seen since the early 1980’s when the U.S. was coping with the Savings & Loan Crisis and record high interest rates. Employers are seeking ways to reduce costs and downsizing continues to be on the rise. However, employee layoffs have significant overt, as well as hidden, costs and all costs should be considered when making a reduction in work force decision.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 2 of 4

Newsletter Subscription

Client Login

How did you find our website?(*)







Invalid Input
linkedIN Twitter